Frequently Asked Questions

Here you'll find answers to the most common questions about our Media Credibility Index tool. If you don't find what you're looking for, please contact our support team.

What exactly is the Media Credibility Index and how can it help me?

The Media Credibility Index is your personal assistant in navigating today's complex media landscape. Our advanced tool uses cutting-edge algorithms to analyze news articles and evaluate their reliability, helping you:

  • Quickly assess the credibility of news sources
  • Identify potential biases in reporting
  • Understand the overall sentiment of articles
  • Compare different sources on the same topic
  • Make more informed decisions about what to read and trust

Whether you're a student researching for a paper, a professional needing reliable sources, or just a concerned citizen wanting to stay informed, our tool provides valuable insights to help you navigate the news landscape with confidence.

How does the analysis process actually work?

Our analysis system uses a sophisticated multi-factor approach to evaluate news content. Here's what happens when you submit an article for analysis:

  1. Source Reputation Check: We examine the historical reliability of the news source, including its track record for accuracy and fact-checking.
  2. Content Analysis: Our algorithms evaluate the writing style, language patterns, and structural elements that often indicate credibility.
  3. Factual Consistency: We cross-reference key claims with verified databases and other reliable sources to check for consistency.
  4. Bias Detection: Specialized algorithms identify potential political, commercial, or ideological biases in the reporting.
  5. Cross-Source Verification: We compare the article with reporting from other sources on the same topic to identify consensus or outliers.

This comprehensive approach gives you a credibility score between 0-1, where higher scores indicate more reliable content. The analysis typically completes in just a few seconds!

How should I interpret the credibility scores?

Our credibility scoring system helps you quickly assess the reliability of news content. Here's how to understand the scores:

0.8 - 1.0 High Credibility

These are our most trusted sources. Articles in this range typically come from:

  • Established news organizations with strong fact-checking policies
  • Sources with a long track record of accuracy
  • Articles that are well-sourced with multiple verifications
  • Content that shows minimal bias and balanced reporting

While still worth reading critically, these sources have demonstrated reliability.

0.6 - 0.79 Medium Credibility

These sources are generally reliable but may have some issues:

  • Might contain minor factual inaccuracies
  • Could show some bias in reporting
  • May lack complete sourcing for all claims
  • Sometimes present opinions as facts

We recommend verifying key claims from these articles with higher-credibility sources.

Below 0.6 Low Credibility

Exercise caution with these sources:

  • Often contain significant factual errors
  • Frequently show strong bias
  • May present unverified claims as facts
  • Sometimes mix opinion with news reporting

We strongly recommend verifying all information from these sources with more reliable outlets.

Remember that even high-credibility sources should be read critically, and all news should be considered in context with other reporting on the same topic.

How can I get the most out of this tool?

Here are some pro tips to maximize the value you get from our Media Credibility Index:

Compare Multiple Sources

Analyze articles from different outlets on the same topic to see how credibility scores vary. This helps identify consensus and outliers in reporting.

Check Over Time

Track how a particular source's credibility changes over time by analyzing multiple articles from the same outlet.

Use the Chart View

Our visualization tools help you quickly compare credibility across different sources and topics at a glance.

Combine with Other Tools

Use our analysis alongside fact-checking sites and media literacy resources for comprehensive verification.

Read Critically

Even high-scoring articles should be read with a critical eye. Look for sourcing, potential biases, and multiple viewpoints.

For best results, we recommend analyzing at least 3-5 articles on any given topic to get a well-rounded perspective.

How does this tool protect my privacy?

We take your privacy extremely seriously. Here's how we protect your information:

No Personal Data Collection

We don't collect or store any personal information about our users. All analysis is completely anonymous.

Local Storage Only

Any analysis data is stored only in your browser's local storage and never sent to our servers unless you explicitly choose to share it.

Secure Connections

All communications with our servers use encrypted HTTPS connections to protect your data in transit.

Easy Data Removal

You can clear your local analysis history at any time with one click, removing all traces of your activity.

We're committed to transparency about our data practices. You can read our full Privacy Policy for complete details about how we handle information.

How much does the Media Credibility Index cost?

Our service uses a freemium model:

  • Free users get limited access to basic article credibility scores and summaries.
  • Premium users pay $5 per month for full access to detailed analysis, advanced metrics, source verification, and priority support.

Premium helps us sustain the project and deliver high-quality AI-based media analysis. You can upgrade at any time through your account page.

What is your refund policy?

Due to the digital and instantly accessible nature of our services, all payments are considered final and non-refundable.

However, if you believe you were charged in error or did not receive the expected service, please contact us at [email protected] within 7 days of purchase and we’ll review your request individually.

We are committed to fair use and your satisfaction.

Back to Analysis